Summary: EBS support runs through 2037, but that doesn't mean businesses should wait until then to modernize. The blog looks at where Oracle Fusion AI agents fit, why the ERP core matters, and how AI can cut the time and effort involved in moving from EBS to Fusion.
Why an AI-infused ERP is a competitive advantage?
EBS 12.2 has Premier Support through at least 2037, which gives many CIOs a good reason to hold off on modernization. After all, the system is stable, familiar, and largely paid for. But keeping an ERP running is one thing; helping the business stay competitive is another. An AI-infused ERP makes it possible to spot margin pressure, cash risks, and supply disruptions as they emerge, rather than waiting for reports to reveal them. With agents taking care of routine work, businesses can handle more transactions, add entities, enter new channels, and manage acquisitions without increasing headcount at the same rate. New capabilities also arrive quarterly, rather than waiting for the next major upgrade. For companies still relying on batch jobs, manual reconciliations, and years of customizations, keeping pace will only get harder.
Modernize the core, or put AI on top?
With budgets under pressure and boards pushing for AI, keeping EBS as it is and adding an AI layer may seem like a sensible compromise. It can work for tasks such as finding information or summarizing documents. But the underlying processes and data still matter. When enterprise AI initiatives run into trouble, the problem often lies in fragmented data and outdated integrations rather than the AI models themselves. Adding AI to a heavily customized EBS may help explain how existing processes work, but it won't fix those processes. The business is then left paying to maintain both the legacy system and the workarounds built around it.
The choice between an AI layer on top of Oracle EBS vs Fusion migration therefore becomes a critical part of your ERP modernization strategy.
The system of record matters more now
Once agents post transactions and approve exceptions, the system beneath them must be clean, standard, and fully auditable. That is what a modern core provides, which is why ERP modernization does not compete with the AI budget. It makes that budget pay off.
Agentic workflows across the enterprise: a hybrid approach
Most business processes involve more than one application. Order-to-cash, for instance, involves CRM, pricing, logistics, and banking systems. Procure-to-pay has its own connections to sourcing tools and supplier networks. AI agents need to work across these systems, and open standards are making that possible. The Model Context Protocol (MCP) allows an agent to securely access data and tools in other applications. Agent-to-agent (A2A) protocols allow agents in different systems to pass work between them. An orchestration layer sits above these agents, keeping track of the process, maintaining context, applying security and approval rules, and making sure failed steps can be rolled back properly.
The answer isn't to put every agent on one AI platform. A hybrid approach makes more sense. Application vendors are already building agents into their products, and for work that stays within those applications, the vendor's own agents are often the better option. They know the underlying data model, use the application's existing security, and get better as new releases come out. But when a process crosses applications, an enterprise layer is needed to coordinate the work. It also provides a common set of rules for identity, policies, monitoring, and audit, regardless of who built the agents. Use native agents for work within an application, connect them through orchestration when a process spans several systems, and build your own only when there's a clear business advantage.
That model depends on reliable systems underneath, and nearly every cross-application process ends in the ERP, where the money moves. A customized EBS, with no native support for these standards, turns each connection into a custom integration. A modern, standard core lets agents from any vendor complete a process end to end, with a full audit trail.
This makes Model Context Protocol (MCP) for ERP integration an important consideration when designing an architecture for enterprise-wide AI agents.
Reimagining processes with AI
In a modern ERP, AI is built into the workflow rather than sitting beside it. Embedded Oracle Fusion AI agents work alongside every user, preparing analysis, answering questions, and surfacing insights at the moment of decision. Agentic applications go further and run entire processes on their own, from matching invoices to reconciling accounts, within the policies and approval limits the business sets. Routine work flows through untouched, and people are brought in only when something is unusual, risky, or needs a decision. Managing by exception becomes the operating model, and leaders see issues as they happen instead of at month-end.
Oracle's recently launched Fusion Claw takes this further. It is a governed execution runtime that lets agentic applications handle complex, long-running work, such as building a staffing schedule or an inventory plan, by pairing AI reasoning with deterministic enterprise computation. Agents plan and re-plan as conditions change, but act only within an operating envelope of the organization's own policies, permissions, risk thresholds, and approval rules, and every outcome is auditable. Because AI is used only where judgment is needed, autonomy also becomes economical at scale. Starting with Claw-powered applications early in the program is one of the fastest ways to move agentic processes into production.
AI-led Fusion implementation
AI can also shorten the work involved in moving to Fusion, right from discovery through to testing. What used to take weeks of interviews during discovery can now be done in days. AI looks at how EBS is being used, including the customizations, and helps identify which ones are still needed. During design, it prepares drafts of future-state processes and configurations based on Fusion standards. Instead of starting from scratch, teams can use workshops to review what has already been prepared. In the build phase, configuration and integration work moves faster, including documentation. AI also helps map, clean, and validate data before testing begins.
Oracle's new Fusion Setup and Configuration Registry (FSCR) takes this further. It captures setup objects, their dependencies, recommended values, and validation rules in a format that coding agents can work with. This allows agents to plan, carry out, and validate configuration using Oracle's own product knowledge. Partners and customers still review and approve the work. Test scripts can then be generated from the approved design and run at scale, with AI helping identify and sort defects.
From what we've seen in our implementations, discovery and design can take 45 to 50 percent less time and effort. Overall implementation timelines and costs can also come down by roughly half, which is consistent with independent industry research. That doesn't mean handing control over to AI. Process owners still sign off on designs, finance and audit teams approve the controls, and the business makes the final call on go-live. Every AI-generated output goes through review and approval by the people responsible for it. Approval checkpoints, traceability from start to finish, and quality checks at each phase help keep the implementation moving without losing accountability or an audit trail.
This AI-led Oracle Fusion implementation methodology can also help organizations accelerate their Oracle EBS to Fusion migration while maintaining governance and control.
Measuring business outcomes in an AI-led ERP
AI has to make a difference to the KPIs the business is already measuring. In order-to-cash, agents can identify accounts at risk, follow up on outstanding payments, and apply cash on an ongoing basis. That means lower DSO, improved cash flow, and more accurate forecasts. In procure-to-pay, invoices that match can go straight through without manual review. AP only needs to look at the exceptions, reducing the cost of processing each invoice, avoiding late payments, and making it easier to capture early-payment discounts. In record-to-report, reconciliations and variance analysis can be done throughout the accounting period instead of leaving everything until month-end. The close takes less time, and finance can spend more of it on analysis.
There is a similar opportunity in other parts of the business. In plan-to-fulfill, agents monitor demand and supply, pick up changes, and recommend a response. The aim is to improve service levels, hold less inventory, and deal with disruptions before they cause bigger problems. In hire-to-retire, agents can take routine employee requests and HR transactions through to completion. Employees don't have to wait as long for service, and HR can spend less time on administration and more on talent priorities.
Elevate the role of people in an AI world
AI isn't about removing people from business processes. It's about changing where they spend their time. When agents take care of matching invoices, following up on payments, and reconciling accounts, employees have more room to deal with difficult exceptions, manage relationships, interpret numbers, and make decisions. AI can provide the information, but people still make the final call and remain accountable for it. Payables teams can spend more time working with suppliers, while planners can focus on different scenarios instead of working through spreadsheets. The work changes, but the need for human judgment doesn't.
EBS may be supported until 2037. The real choice is between AI that works around the business and AI that changes how it runs. The companies that choose the second will not wait ten years to start.
Explore Jade Global's Oracle Consulting Services to modernize your ERP, streamline business processes, and unlock greater value from AI-driven automation. Connect with our experts to explore what’s possible for your enterprise.